Sunday, May 17, 2020

The American Revolution - 1371 Words

The American Revolution was revolutionary by definition because it was successful in bringing about political, economic, and social reform. The colonies fought to be free of the British monarchy and replace it with self-government and with representatives elected by the citizens to govern to the will of the people. This was a radical change in the political stage where the people were ruled by a distant king that had no interest in the welfare of the colonies beyond its enrichment to the crown. The colonies gained an economic benefit from their detachment from England as well. All of the revenue created by the colonies was now their own. The trade restrictions created by the idea of mercantilism were no longer in place. All of the raw materials and natural resources that the colonies supplied England with such as indigo, cotton, tobacco, and rice were now owned by the colonies solely. The new political structure also brought about major changes to the social norms. People of all classes had a role in their own government. The differences between the social classes became a little less prominent since all had a say in the government. The colonies’ revolt from England politicized women and African Americans and even though the major changes for these classes came later in history it is important to recognize that the Revolution was the beginning of these changes. The new government, through the powerful new constitution, opened the door for individual roles to continueShow MoreRelatedThe American Revolution : The Revolution1367 Words   |  6 PagesThe American Revolution Revolutionizes the World It was the first revolution to majorly succeed and change how people saw their countries, it was the American Revolution. The American Revolution was the first successful revolution against a European empire that provided a model for many other colonial peoples who realized that they too could break away and become self-governing nations (New world Encyclopedia, 1).The American Revolution was vital to history because ideas seen by other countries startedRead MoreThe Revolution Of The American Revolution999 Words   |  4 PagesBetween 1770 and 1776, resistance to imperial change turned into a full-on revolution. The American Revolution, also known as the Revolutionary War, was a time of revolting and political uprising, in which the 13 colonies separated from the British Empire, forming the independent nation known as the United States of America. Though the American Revolution began because the colonies wanted independence from Britain, many important historical events and revolts also lead to the tensions and resistanceRead MoreThe Revolution Of The American Revolution1362 Words   |  6 PagesEvery 4th of July, Americans are told the story of the American Revolution. We remember the oppressed colonists fighting against the tyrannical King George III and the formidable red coats. Patriotic heroes are remembered, evil kings are cursed, and the liberties and freedoms won from the war are celebrated. Though America often likes to look back to the revolution, the question of just how much a revolution was the American Revolution is rarely asked. While the American revolution was not as radicalRead MoreThe Revolution Of The American Revolution863 Words   |  4 PagesThere are many different views on how the American Revolution came to be and how it actually was. One way is that the colonists that had money and were known as the elite were trying to preserve their power from the British and this is what caused the revolutionary war. Then on the other hand bef ore the revolutionary war occurred when the colonists were being over controlled by the British, then in result of the American Revolution the colonists were able to win against the British and become strongerRead MoreThe Revolution Of The American Revolution1582 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"The revolution was effected before the war commenced. The revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people.† - John Adams, 1818 This quote means that the revolution actually took place metaphorically before the actually fighting began. It took place in the emotions and thoughts of the Americans. The Road to Revolution After the Seven Years’ War created a financial problem for Britain The British tried to shoulder some of the financial responsibilities onto the Americas in the form of variousRead MoreThe Revolution Of The American Revolution850 Words   |  4 PagesIn regards to the American Revolution, the point that armed rebellion became inevitable arrived when after nearly five constant years of American colonist protesting. American s had enough and needed to take a stand for the numerous inequalities they were forced to deal with. It was foreseeable that the American Revolution took place due to the unfair taxes that the British were giving Americans. Also, England was not allowing Americans their freedom, along with violence and the political dominanceRead MoreThe American Revolution. The American Revolution Started1581 Words   |  7 PagesThe American Revolution The American Revolution started when King George the 3rd decided to make the American Colonies pay a large amount of money for the debt of the French and Indian War by giving the colonist different types of taxes like the Sugar Act in 1764. The sugar Act of 1764 was a British Law that was passed on April 5, 1764, that collected incomes from the 13 colonies. The act put a huge tax on the sugar and molasses that were imported into the colonies which were a huge impact for theRead MoreThe American Revolution1337 Words   |  6 PagesThe American Revolution was much more than an insurrection against British tariffs and patronage decree. Rather, it was a bureaucratic catastrophe in which colonists from the thirteen American colonies denied the British sovereignty, eradicated the jurisdiction of Great Britain and established the United States of America. The upheaval was a primitive modern revolution in which generality traversed for liberty in the statute of law, constitutional privilege and supremacy. Ensuing years of contentionRead MoreThe American Revolution889 Words   |  4 PagesThe American Revolution was one of the most vital events in American History lasting form 1775 to 1783, it effected the nation socially, economically and politically. The American Revolution brought upon many changes in America, and freedom of the nation. The Revolutionary War was a stepping stone to what we are as a nation today, it created both short and long-term effects on the world. When wanting to blame a certain side, the British politicians or the American agitators, several key points leadRead MoreThe American Revolution993 Words   |  4 PagesThe topic of the American Revolution is a topic that has been discussed on multiple levels and is extremely well-known, especially within the United States. The details are a little on the generic and basic side but it is at least understood on some level. Most people are aware of the American standpoint, the what, why, how, and when , but there is much more depth to what occurred. The war was obviously between the Americas and the Mother country of Britain, but there were more than just those two

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Analysis Of The Sermon On The Mount And The Allegory...

Human Knowledge During the first few weeks of class we’ve gone through various texts in order to better our understanding of human knowledge. We have talked about Christianity St. Matthew â€Å"The Sermon on the Mount†, Plato and â€Å"The Allegory of the Cave†, â€Å"The Four Idols† of Sir Francis Bacon, Robert Frost’s â€Å"Mending Wall†, and even Carl Jung and â€Å"The Structure of the Psyche†. All these texts may have been written in different eras and different places, but they have one thing in common, and that is their understandings of human nature and knowledge, and how they demonstrate to us epistemology (how we know) and metaphysics (what human beings know). To begin with, we have Christianity of St. Matthew â€Å"The Sermon on the Mount†. After that, we have Plato and the Allegory of the Cave. In this text Plato distinguishes between people who mistake sensory knowledge for the truth and people who really do see the truth. The story begins in the cave where there are three prisoners, those three prisoners have never seen life outside the cave and have stayed in the cave since their birth day. Outside the cave people carry animals, plants, and etc. The only thing the people inside the cave see are the shadows, not the real object itself. Plato along with the prisoners guess the objects they will see next. Then, one of prisoners escapes from their bindings and leaves the cave. When he is out he is very surprised to what is outside the cave and then realizes that his former view of realityShow MoreRelatedPlato s Allegory Of The Cave And The Gospel Of Matthew s Sermon On The Mount1757 Words   |  8 PagesTwo distinct texts that may seem at odds when superficially compared, hinge on shared foundational values. Course stu dy and personal analysis of Plato’s â€Å"Allegory of the Cave† and the Gospel of Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount indicate both appeal against ignorance and warn against egotistic behavior. Both texts take a tactful and thoughtful examination of man’s inability to comfortably, consistently, and effectively look beyond their individual selves as the key figures in a normalized and standardized

Ethical and Unethical Leadership Plan

Question: Discuss about the Ethical and Unethical Leadership Plan. Answer: Introduction: From my experiences leaders are often inconstant in their communications and in their actions. These inconsistencies are truly noted from the followers thus dampening the morale of followers leading to lower efficacy and effectiveness that often spreads ramped throughout the organizational culture as a whole. Senior leadership often takes a top down approach that oftenmisses the small details that can make a huge difference in the operations of an organization where the tasks are being completed (Pecukonis, 2014). Therefore, it is important that the leaders should have a personal development plan. There are various improvement areas that leaders can focus on. In this personal leadership plan I would focus on value based leadership, teamwork and ethics. A values-based leader uses strong ethics and morals to lead and leading by example in a way that encourages the entire organization to follow suit. Open communication is a key component to making it all work. It would be correct to say that leader sets the tone for his or her organization and isthe one on which the reputation of the organization hinges with both internaland external stakeholders (Talan, 2014). In short, Ithink that values-based leadership starts at the top and that it filters downto middle management and rank-and-file employees. Oftentimes, there is a disconnect between the activities of the leader and the intentions of the leader. Leaders sometimes become overwhelmed with the activities and results to step back and recall why they do what they do. The second important dimension of the leadership model is ethics. Daft, (2015) explains that an organizations board that handles unethical behavior is top executives of the organization that form an ethics committee. This ethics committee has the responsibility to oversee the function of ethics in the organization (Daft, 2015). They provide rulings of wrong behavior and in the event leaders are unethical they determine the disciplinary action that should be given to correct the wrongdoing. Even though the organization is profitable, unethical leaders must still be corrected to preserve the ethics and moral standing of the organization at large (Brown Mitchell, 2010). By doing so, this can ensure that the organization remains profitable and stay out of harms way of negative attention of the public and lawsuits that can occur because of unethical activity within the organization. Brown and Mitchell, (2010) also share that unethical leaders can bring out a dark side of organizations. T his is because unethical leadership can cause organizational behaviors to shift to a negative light. This then changes the emotion, fit, and identification of the organization (Brown Mitchell, 2010). This causes harm to the organization being that what leaders are seen followers will then portray doing. Therefore, the ethics committee must enforce proper ethics in the organization to safeguard the organization. It is often too easy to follow the leader in organizations. DuBois (2012) reminded us that doing the right thing is not easy but there are ways to address unethical leadership and righting the ship. DuBois (2012) pointed out that not getting involved with unethical leaders is the first step to protecting yourself but she suggested that if you are involved because of your position bringing to light is not an option. Forcing strict internal policies is a way to weed out unethical behavior. This model suggests that When leaders become unethical, it is the responsibility of the organizational board and ethical committee, if applicable, to get involved. If the leader is acting in an unethical manner but the company is profitable, there will appear to be an ethical dilemma. On one side, the leader is unethical and has avoided the ethical standards of the organization. However, the company is remaining profitable, despite his or her actions. The organizational board must enforce the ethical standards through disciplinary actions of leaders who are unethical. Pascual-Ezama, et al. (2015) stated that unethical behavior could be influence by peer effect, incentives and supervision. If leaders are unethical, their behaviors can carry on to the followers, which can lead to an unethical organization. The third important dimension of my leadership model is teamwork or support from employees. As Plucknette (2014) discusses, leaders tend to invite discussion and debate. This can be an issue for a leader-focused individual because many managers look down upon these qualities and see opposition as insubordination. Conversely, the attitude of many manager-focused individuals is that what they say is law and the final word. This type of managing can inhibit the growth of trust and respect for the manager by the employee(s) (Plucknette, 2014). Leaders may be better set to organize and lead whereas managers may be better at planning and controlling. It is the leader/manager who can meld the two that will be an effective leader.It is important that the leaders must follow on all the three dimensions of this leadership development model. In addition to the three core values or the core dimension of the leadership development model, the model would also have support or non-core attributes. T he core and the Core Values Support/ Non Core Values Value Based Leadership Communication Ethics Collaboration Teamwork Vision The three dimension of my leadership development model can be depicted as: The application of the above leadership model would enable the organization to develop leaders from managers. A managers primary challenge is to solve problems creatively. Managers will analyze, delegate, organize and control which to some people may seem to be a know it best attitude. Managers are more concerned of end results. Leaders approach situations with the attitude that no one person knows it best so they a leader will do something, fix it, try it, change it and do it all over again and are more concerned with satisfaction whether for employees or customers (Graham, 2014). Leaders see people as critical resources to be developed, and this in turn will help the organization to achieve process innovation. Managers view people as an exploitable resource. I think the challenges are accountability; leaders tend to emphasize on mutual accountability as opposed to managers who emphasize on individual accountability. The greatest challenge, according to Clarke (2013) regarding operationalizing strategy of teamwork is because operationalizing has to connect the strategy and its execution within the company. This step is most important and the art of doing it requires finesse and mixes strategic planning and program management. These skills require a different set of skills and discipline than the planning phase. One must understand the strategy, goals and the initiatives they represent. Next, is to group initiatives into programs that are goal-aligned. Mapping the initiatives in terms of impact on the company is next and who will execute. Individuals need to be accountability, which requires clarity of roles and responsibilities relative to the goals. The executor must have the understanding of the innovation in order to execute the plan along with sufficient incentive. The biggest challenge of teamwork is in multicultural environment. The biggest challenge of working with a cross-functional team is to accommodate everyones perspective. Each person or function has a view of the problem and solutions that is based on their vantage point, concerns, and presuppositions. To meet the overall mission of the organization all of this must be weighed out and the best way forward should become clear (Daft, 2013). The purpose of utilizing a cross functional team is the assumption that a small group can accomplish more than an individual based on skills, accountability and commitment. There are a variety of reasons this type of approach could be utilized; overcoming the limits of a hierarchal struggle, improving the quality of decision making, increasing organizational flexibility, and increasing organizational productivity. The application of this leadership model is beneficial not only my personal development but also for the department or group development and the organizational development. As a conclusion, I would like to say that communication and collaboration is the key to implement this model in organizations. Collaborating in the workplace is essential unless you are a super hero with all knowing powers. Working collaboratively sometimes is smooth from the beginning and sometimes it takes a while for each participant to feel like they have an equal voice in the process. Cross-functional teams have been described as team comprised of employees with similar ranked positions within a company (Daft, 2014). It is important that my leadership development model should be implemented with a long-term vision. This model should be implemented as a top-down approach. The senior leadership should communicate about the benefits of this leadership model to different managers in the organization. I think your idea about having meetings and regular communications with the other managers makes a lot of sense. It seems like such a logical solution for the lack of communication. Sometimes those solutions are the ones that are overlooked in the middle of chaos. The above leadership model would address the issue of communication and ensure that the leaders can follow on the core values. References Bliss, D.L., Pecukonis, E. and Snyder-Vogel, M., 2014. Principled Leadership Development Model for Aspiring Social Work Managers and Administrators: Development and Application.Human Services Organizations Management, Leadership Governance,38(1), pp.5-15. Brown, M. E., Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and Unethical Leadership: Exploring New Avenues for Future Research.Business Ethics Quarterly,20(4), 583-616. Clarke, N., 2013. Model of complexity leadership development.Human Resource Development International,16(2), pp.135-150. Daft, R. L. (2015).Organization theory and design(12th ed.) Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning. Gifford, W., Graham, I., Eldh, A.C. and Lefebre, N., 2014. Theoretical foundations of dissemination and implementation leadership: a conceptual model for leadership development. InThe 7th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 8-9 Dec, 2014. Lepsinger, R., DeRosa, D. (2015). How to Lead an Effective Virtual Team. Ivey Business Journal, 2-6. Pascual-Ezama, D., Dunfield, D., Gil-Gmez de Lia, B., (2015) Organizations Board. Prince Hall. Plucknette, D. (2014). 4 differences between managers and leaders.Plant Engineering,68(10), 16-18. Talan, T.N., Bloom, P.J. and Kelton, R.E., 2014. Building the Leadership Capacity of Early Childhood Directors: An Evaluation of a Leadership Development Model.Early Childhood Research Practice,16(1), p.n1.